<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Webquills.net - Latest Comments in Movable Type Open Source &amp;#8211; again</title><link>http://webquills.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://webquills.disqus.com/movable_type_open_source_8211_again/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:33:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Movable Type Open Source &amp;#8211; again</title><link>http://wordpress.webquills.net/news-commentary/movable-type-open-source-again.html#comment-21522483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be accurate, MT was never open source before now, though people certainly felt like it was, and there's always been a free (as in beer) version. Glad to know we're meeting your expectations, and I hope you give the new version a try and see what's coming. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anil Dash</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movable Type Open Source &amp;#8211; again</title><link>http://wordpress.webquills.net/news-commentary/movable-type-open-source-again.html#comment-21522484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MT was never open source; it was free. That's an entirely different thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Su</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>